Diversity in Education Resource
Tuesday, June 30, 2015
The Brown-Bag Teacher: Daily 5 Book Study: Chapter 1
The Brown-Bag Teacher: Daily 5 Book Study: Chapter 1: Hello friends! Today I
Monday, June 9, 2014
Inciting Change in Secondary English Language Programs: The Case of Cherry High School by Marilee Coles-Ritchie
English Learners in Special Education
My Final Research Paper
This paper is the beginning of understanding of the complexities that are inherent in determining where to place ELs to maximize their learning experience. From here, I would love to go on to study more about appropriate assessment in such situations, and why alternative programs such as dual immersion and sheltered English have better outcomes in terms of SPED placement.
This paper is the beginning of understanding of the complexities that are inherent in determining where to place ELs to maximize their learning experience. From here, I would love to go on to study more about appropriate assessment in such situations, and why alternative programs such as dual immersion and sheltered English have better outcomes in terms of SPED placement.
Culture in Educating Children
Created in Omnisketch by Brittinie Gleave
Remember Agatha from the Yupik dual language school: "it is our cultural responsibility to teach the language". Look up her story in Culturally Responsive TeachingLoss of Family Language link in previous post
There is a very relevant quote that I CAN'T FIND! I think it was Lisa Delpit, and something about being surprised at a question about separating language and culture. She goes on to describe language as what a mother sings to her infant, etc. It was a beautiful quote, and I remember highlighting it, but alas, it seems to have disappeared...
Sunday, June 8, 2014
The Roles and Responsibilities of Teachers of English Learners
The roles and
responsibilities of teachers depend on the goals teachers have for their
students. If the goal is to have students assimilate into the school culture
and perform well on English language measures, then this teacher may see it as
her/his role to help the student learn English as quickly as possible, even at
the expense of the home language. If the goal is to help the student become
academically successful, and be college-bound, then the teacher’s role may be
to use the students’ language to develop academic language until the student
is proficient enough in English to function well in an academic setting.
Finally, if it is the teacher’s goal to help the student develop self-efficacy and
become operating members of a democratic society, then it is the teacher’s
responsibility to help the student learn how to negotiate situations and
develop all areas of potential. All students’ potential is enhanced by learning
languages. Therefore, teachers with this goal will consider all languages as
valuable resources that s/he has a responsibility to preserve while also teaching English (see Delpit’s article for arguments on why English should be taught in conjunction with first language)*
*In pursuit of this goal, teachers also have a responsibility to learn about language development and the acquisition of a second language (see Wong’s article on what teachers should know about language).
Big “D” discourse and how it might impact schooling for ELs
James Paul Gee Photo Credit: Wikipedia |
Discourse
is the language that shapes one’s social identity. In fulfilling the primary
need to belong, people from a young age, and often without conscious awareness
align themselves with the discourses of their surroundings. For some, these
discourses mesh with the dominant Discourse—that of the dominant culture. For
others, the discourses are a mismatch to the dominant culture, which keeps them
at odds (oppressed) throughout their lifetimes. There are theorists who argue
that the discourse of upbringing cannot be transcended (Gee),
while others
believe that operating within the dominant discourse can be a learned practice
(Delpit).
Lisa Delpit Photo Credit: New Learning online |
This is where critical language pedagogy comes in. In teaching
students that there is power in certain language and giving them access to that
language (through explicit lessons on effective language use, relating language
to content or classroom practices), teachers can apprentice students into the
dominant discourse. Once they are part of the discourse, as Delpit claims, they
can change it, as Discourse is dynamic and malleable (though it is also
stubborn and persistent).
I
remember learning that English was the third language of author Joseph Conrad
just after reading Heart of Darkness.
This new information allowed me to put my finger on why the language of the
book is so powerful. Conrad was able to pick and choose words with an outsider’s
perspective, objectively. Critically taught students have the same potential, though
some objectivity may be lost. Students taught in this way can be selective with
language, manipulating it depending on the situation. Students without such
education—even those who are part of the Discourse—are at a disadvantage,
because they have available only that one perspective and the language within
it.
Picture from Amazon.com |
Other resources that helped formulate these opinions are:
Photo from Amazon.com |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)